WolfSSL argues C remains optimal for production cryptography because memory safety alone doesn't ensure cryptographic security. While Rust offers real benefits, serious implementations require unsafe code and assembly, making C's portability, ecosystem stability, and proven track record more valuable than language-level safety guarantees.
Infrastructure
Why C Remains the Gold Standard for Cryptographic Software
WolfSSL argues that production cryptography requires unsafe code even in memory-safe languages like Rust, making C's mature ecosystem and portability more practical than language-level safety guarantees for real-world deployments.
Sunday, April 26, 2026 12:00 PM UTC2 MIN READSOURCE: LobstersBY sys://pipeline
Tags
infrastructure
/// RELATED
SafetyApr 22
Garbage Collection Without Unsafe Code
safe-gc becomes the first garbage collection library for Rust to eliminate unsafe code entirely—both in API and implementation—proving that GC and memory safety aren't fundamentally at odds.
ResearchApr 22
The Edge of Safe Rust
Rust developer at TokioConf 2026 demonstrates how to implement garbage collection semantics entirely within safe Rust using advanced type system patterns.